Review



rabbit anti cgrp  (Boster Bio)


Bioz Verified Symbol Boster Bio is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Boster Bio manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Boster Bio rabbit anti cgrp
    Rabbit Anti Cgrp, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+cgrp/Anti-CRCP+Rabbit+Monoclonal+Antibody/pm41833631-126-28-31
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti cgrp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Incubation:

    Article Title: Artesunate alleviates post-central stroke pain by inhibiting metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in the cerebral cortex in rats.
    Article Snippet: .. The biofilm was sealed with 5% skimmed milk for 2 h and incubated overnight at 4◦C with primary antibodies: mouse antiTRPV1 (1:1000, Abcam#ab235447), rabbit anti-mGluR5 (1:1000, Boster#A01338-1), and rabbit anti-CGRP (1:1000, Boster#M04247). .. The membrane was washed three times for 10 min with TBST solution and incubated for 2 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidaselabelled secondary antibody, which was GAPDH (1:20,000, Abcam#ab8245).

    Staining:

    Article Title: Cancer-induced Nerve Injury Unveils a Sympathetic-to-Sensory Nerve Axis in Head and Neck Cancer
    Article Snippet: .. Primary antibodies used to assess sympathetic and sensory innervation were sheep anti-TH (1:250, Millipore Sigma), or rabbit anti-CGRP (1:250, Cell Signaling Technology) respectively; rabbit anti-PGP9.5 (Boster Bio) was used as a pan-neuronal stain and mouse anti-GFAP (1:250, Sigma-Aldrich) was used to identify an injury response. ..



    Similar Products

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti cgrp
    Anti Cgrp, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+cgrp/CGRP+Rabbit+mAb/pm41922778-651-190-192
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cgrp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Boster Bio rabbit anti cgrp
    Rabbit Anti Cgrp, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+cgrp/Anti-CRCP+Rabbit+Monoclonal+Antibody/pm41833631-126-28-31
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti cgrp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti cgrp
    (A and B) Representative images of OSCC tumor serial sections stained with either anti-Tubb3 (top, green outline), anti-TRPV1 (middle, red outline), <t>or</t> <t>anti-CGRP</t> (bottom, blue outline) from a patient with (A) and without (B) CGRPα + nerve innervation. Positive stains are indicated by red (TRPV1) or blue (CGRP) arrows. Tumor margins are indicated by a gray dashed line. Image magnification: 6× (left) and 40× (right). Scale bar: 200 μm. (C) Quantification of the percentage of total TRPV1 and CGRP-IR nerve area relative to total Tubb3-IR nerve area across tumor tissue sections from 23 patients with HNSCC. Density is reported as a stacked bar graph. (D) Quantification of the percentage of total CD8 T cell density per square millimeter. (E) Representative images of OSCC tumor serial sections with either a large nerve bundle and low anti-CD8 or small nerve presence and high anti-CD8 immunoreactivity. Scale bar: 150 μm. (F and G) Simple linear regressions were run between patient-reported pain, percentage of total CGRP-IR nerve area relative to total Tubb3-IR, and CD8 + T cell density relative to tumor area. Pain was measured by the FACT-HN additional question 12, “I have pain in my mouth, throat or neck” (FACT-HN10). The response to this question is rated on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Spearman correlation r coefficients are listed on each graph; p < 0.05. Patient demographics are located in .
    Rabbit Anti Cgrp, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+cgrp/pmc13007003-358-23-26
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti cgrp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc cgrp
    (A and B) Representative images of OSCC tumor serial sections stained with either anti-Tubb3 (top, green outline), anti-TRPV1 (middle, red outline), <t>or</t> <t>anti-CGRP</t> (bottom, blue outline) from a patient with (A) and without (B) CGRPα + nerve innervation. Positive stains are indicated by red (TRPV1) or blue (CGRP) arrows. Tumor margins are indicated by a gray dashed line. Image magnification: 6× (left) and 40× (right). Scale bar: 200 μm. (C) Quantification of the percentage of total TRPV1 and CGRP-IR nerve area relative to total Tubb3-IR nerve area across tumor tissue sections from 23 patients with HNSCC. Density is reported as a stacked bar graph. (D) Quantification of the percentage of total CD8 T cell density per square millimeter. (E) Representative images of OSCC tumor serial sections with either a large nerve bundle and low anti-CD8 or small nerve presence and high anti-CD8 immunoreactivity. Scale bar: 150 μm. (F and G) Simple linear regressions were run between patient-reported pain, percentage of total CGRP-IR nerve area relative to total Tubb3-IR, and CD8 + T cell density relative to tumor area. Pain was measured by the FACT-HN additional question 12, “I have pain in my mouth, throat or neck” (FACT-HN10). The response to this question is rated on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Spearman correlation r coefficients are listed on each graph; p < 0.05. Patient demographics are located in .
    Cgrp, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+cgrp/CGRP+Rabbit+mAb/pm41691467-237-3-7
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cgrp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti cgrp antibody
    EA intervention inhibits TrkA expression in <t>CGRP</t> + neurons in DRG of KOA model rats. ( A ) Representative immunofluorescence images of TrkA in DRG from saline group, MIA group, MIA + sham EA group and EA group. Scale bar = 200 µm. ( B ) Quantification of the number of TrkA + cells in DRG across the four groups (per group, n = 3). *p < 0.05; ns: not significant. ( C ) Representative images of double-labelling immunostaining of TrkA + with CGRP + , IB4 + <t>,</t> <t>NF200</t> + in DRG sections from the saline, MIA, MIA + sham EA, and MIA + EA groups, scale bars = 200 µm. ( D) Pie chart summarizing the proportion of TrkA co-localization in IB4 + , CGRP + , and NF200 + neurons in KOA model rats. Three sections were analyzed per rat, and the results were averaged. ( E ) Quantification of the percentage of CGRP + neurons co-expressing TrkA in the DRG across the four groups (per group, n = 3). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns: ns: not significant. ( F ) Quantification of the percentage of IB4 + neurons co-expressing TrkA in the DRG across the four groups (per group, n = 3). *p < 0.05; ns: not significant. ( G ) Quantification of the percentage of NF200 + neurons co-expressing TrkA in the DRG across the four groups (per group, n = 3).
    Rabbit Anti Cgrp Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+cgrp/pmc13047915-88-34-38
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti cgrp antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A and B) Representative images of OSCC tumor serial sections stained with either anti-Tubb3 (top, green outline), anti-TRPV1 (middle, red outline), or anti-CGRP (bottom, blue outline) from a patient with (A) and without (B) CGRPα + nerve innervation. Positive stains are indicated by red (TRPV1) or blue (CGRP) arrows. Tumor margins are indicated by a gray dashed line. Image magnification: 6× (left) and 40× (right). Scale bar: 200 μm. (C) Quantification of the percentage of total TRPV1 and CGRP-IR nerve area relative to total Tubb3-IR nerve area across tumor tissue sections from 23 patients with HNSCC. Density is reported as a stacked bar graph. (D) Quantification of the percentage of total CD8 T cell density per square millimeter. (E) Representative images of OSCC tumor serial sections with either a large nerve bundle and low anti-CD8 or small nerve presence and high anti-CD8 immunoreactivity. Scale bar: 150 μm. (F and G) Simple linear regressions were run between patient-reported pain, percentage of total CGRP-IR nerve area relative to total Tubb3-IR, and CD8 + T cell density relative to tumor area. Pain was measured by the FACT-HN additional question 12, “I have pain in my mouth, throat or neck” (FACT-HN10). The response to this question is rated on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Spearman correlation r coefficients are listed on each graph; p < 0.05. Patient demographics are located in .

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: CGRP signaling links tumor-associated pain to immune evasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2026.116994

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A and B) Representative images of OSCC tumor serial sections stained with either anti-Tubb3 (top, green outline), anti-TRPV1 (middle, red outline), or anti-CGRP (bottom, blue outline) from a patient with (A) and without (B) CGRPα + nerve innervation. Positive stains are indicated by red (TRPV1) or blue (CGRP) arrows. Tumor margins are indicated by a gray dashed line. Image magnification: 6× (left) and 40× (right). Scale bar: 200 μm. (C) Quantification of the percentage of total TRPV1 and CGRP-IR nerve area relative to total Tubb3-IR nerve area across tumor tissue sections from 23 patients with HNSCC. Density is reported as a stacked bar graph. (D) Quantification of the percentage of total CD8 T cell density per square millimeter. (E) Representative images of OSCC tumor serial sections with either a large nerve bundle and low anti-CD8 or small nerve presence and high anti-CD8 immunoreactivity. Scale bar: 150 μm. (F and G) Simple linear regressions were run between patient-reported pain, percentage of total CGRP-IR nerve area relative to total Tubb3-IR, and CD8 + T cell density relative to tumor area. Pain was measured by the FACT-HN additional question 12, “I have pain in my mouth, throat or neck” (FACT-HN10). The response to this question is rated on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Spearman correlation r coefficients are listed on each graph; p < 0.05. Patient demographics are located in .

    Article Snippet: Slides were incubated overnight in PBS +/+ containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% Tween 20 and one of the following primary antibodies: Rabbit anti-CGRP (1:500, Cell Signaling Technologies), Rabbit anti-TRPV1 (1:500, Alomone Labs), Guinea pig anti-TRPV1 (1:500, Millipore).

    Techniques: Staining

    (A) Representative images of CGRP-IR in 300 μm optically cleared sagittal tongue sections from naive (left), MOC1 (middle), and MOC2 (right) tumor-bearing mice (10× magnification stitch, full focus z stack). Scale bar: 0.5 mm. (B) Representative images of co-staining with anti-CGRP and the pan-neuronal marker PGP9.5 in a 20 μm sagittal tongue section to demonstrate CGRP antibody specificity. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) Representative images of neurite outgrowth in dissociated TG neurons in response to 24 h incubation in cell culture medium, MOC2 CM, or MOC2 medium + 1 μM anti-NGF monoclonal antibody (αNGF). A TG from one mouse was used for each treatment group, and the experiment was replicated five times ( n = 3 males, 2 females). For analysis, dissociated neurons were stained with anti-Tubb3 to visualize neurites and anti-NeuN to visualize cell bodies. Scale bar: 50 μm. (D–F) Integrative density of Tubb3 + neurites relative to the number of cell bodies in each field in response to medium and CM with or without αNGF; 12 areas of each chamber were imaged under 20× magnification, and analysis was completed within cell culture type (i.e., PEK, MOC1, and MOC2). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001.

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: CGRP signaling links tumor-associated pain to immune evasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2026.116994

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Representative images of CGRP-IR in 300 μm optically cleared sagittal tongue sections from naive (left), MOC1 (middle), and MOC2 (right) tumor-bearing mice (10× magnification stitch, full focus z stack). Scale bar: 0.5 mm. (B) Representative images of co-staining with anti-CGRP and the pan-neuronal marker PGP9.5 in a 20 μm sagittal tongue section to demonstrate CGRP antibody specificity. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) Representative images of neurite outgrowth in dissociated TG neurons in response to 24 h incubation in cell culture medium, MOC2 CM, or MOC2 medium + 1 μM anti-NGF monoclonal antibody (αNGF). A TG from one mouse was used for each treatment group, and the experiment was replicated five times ( n = 3 males, 2 females). For analysis, dissociated neurons were stained with anti-Tubb3 to visualize neurites and anti-NeuN to visualize cell bodies. Scale bar: 50 μm. (D–F) Integrative density of Tubb3 + neurites relative to the number of cell bodies in each field in response to medium and CM with or without αNGF; 12 areas of each chamber were imaged under 20× magnification, and analysis was completed within cell culture type (i.e., PEK, MOC1, and MOC2). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Slides were incubated overnight in PBS +/+ containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% Tween 20 and one of the following primary antibodies: Rabbit anti-CGRP (1:500, Cell Signaling Technologies), Rabbit anti-TRPV1 (1:500, Alomone Labs), Guinea pig anti-TRPV1 (1:500, Millipore).

    Techniques: Staining, Marker, Incubation, Cell Culture

    (A) Representative image of a coronal tongue section from non-tumor bearing mice 1 week following treatment with vehicle (top) or RTX (bottom), stained with anti-CGRP to demonstrate loss of CGRP-expressing fibers following RTX treatment. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Schematic of the trigeminal CGRP release assay. (C) CGRP protein quantification in TG isolated from mice 1 week after RTX injection into the tongue ( n = 5 F/group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Independent t test, ** p < 0.01. (D) Representative ATF3 staining of in TRPV1-IR neurons in the trigeminal mandibular branch in TG sections from vehicle- and RTX-treated mice. Scale bar: 50 μm. (E) Percentage of ATF3 + TRPV1 + neurons relative to total TRPV1 + neurons in the V3 region from across 9 sections/mouse of mice treated with vehicle or RTX ( n = 3 vehicle, 4 RTX). Tissue was collected 7 days after treatment. There was no difference in the number of TRPV1 neurons between groups. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Independent t test, *** p < 0.005. (F) RTX treatment did not affect body weight compared to vehicle-treated mice. Change in body weight was calculated as (post-treatment day 7) – (weight on first day of treatment). Independent t test. (G) Representative H&E-stained 5 μm tongue sections from vehicle- and RTX-treated mice 21 days after treatment. The tumor boundary is indicated by a black dashed line. Scale bar: 1 mm. (H) MOC1 tumor volume between groups over time ( n = 5 F/group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. two-way ANOVA, * p < 0.05. (I and J) Example dot plots and quantification of CD3 + T cell subtype, CD19 + B cells, and NK1.1 + natural killer (NK) cells between groups ( n = 3 F/group). Within-subtype t test comparison, **** p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: CGRP signaling links tumor-associated pain to immune evasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2026.116994

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Representative image of a coronal tongue section from non-tumor bearing mice 1 week following treatment with vehicle (top) or RTX (bottom), stained with anti-CGRP to demonstrate loss of CGRP-expressing fibers following RTX treatment. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Schematic of the trigeminal CGRP release assay. (C) CGRP protein quantification in TG isolated from mice 1 week after RTX injection into the tongue ( n = 5 F/group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Independent t test, ** p < 0.01. (D) Representative ATF3 staining of in TRPV1-IR neurons in the trigeminal mandibular branch in TG sections from vehicle- and RTX-treated mice. Scale bar: 50 μm. (E) Percentage of ATF3 + TRPV1 + neurons relative to total TRPV1 + neurons in the V3 region from across 9 sections/mouse of mice treated with vehicle or RTX ( n = 3 vehicle, 4 RTX). Tissue was collected 7 days after treatment. There was no difference in the number of TRPV1 neurons between groups. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Independent t test, *** p < 0.005. (F) RTX treatment did not affect body weight compared to vehicle-treated mice. Change in body weight was calculated as (post-treatment day 7) – (weight on first day of treatment). Independent t test. (G) Representative H&E-stained 5 μm tongue sections from vehicle- and RTX-treated mice 21 days after treatment. The tumor boundary is indicated by a black dashed line. Scale bar: 1 mm. (H) MOC1 tumor volume between groups over time ( n = 5 F/group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. two-way ANOVA, * p < 0.05. (I and J) Example dot plots and quantification of CD3 + T cell subtype, CD19 + B cells, and NK1.1 + natural killer (NK) cells between groups ( n = 3 F/group). Within-subtype t test comparison, **** p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: Slides were incubated overnight in PBS +/+ containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% Tween 20 and one of the following primary antibodies: Rabbit anti-CGRP (1:500, Cell Signaling Technologies), Rabbit anti-TRPV1 (1:500, Alomone Labs), Guinea pig anti-TRPV1 (1:500, Millipore).

    Techniques: Staining, Expressing, Release Assay, Isolation, Injection, Comparison

    EA intervention inhibits TrkA expression in CGRP + neurons in DRG of KOA model rats. ( A ) Representative immunofluorescence images of TrkA in DRG from saline group, MIA group, MIA + sham EA group and EA group. Scale bar = 200 µm. ( B ) Quantification of the number of TrkA + cells in DRG across the four groups (per group, n = 3). *p < 0.05; ns: not significant. ( C ) Representative images of double-labelling immunostaining of TrkA + with CGRP + , IB4 + , NF200 + in DRG sections from the saline, MIA, MIA + sham EA, and MIA + EA groups, scale bars = 200 µm. ( D) Pie chart summarizing the proportion of TrkA co-localization in IB4 + , CGRP + , and NF200 + neurons in KOA model rats. Three sections were analyzed per rat, and the results were averaged. ( E ) Quantification of the percentage of CGRP + neurons co-expressing TrkA in the DRG across the four groups (per group, n = 3). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns: ns: not significant. ( F ) Quantification of the percentage of IB4 + neurons co-expressing TrkA in the DRG across the four groups (per group, n = 3). *p < 0.05; ns: not significant. ( G ) Quantification of the percentage of NF200 + neurons co-expressing TrkA in the DRG across the four groups (per group, n = 3).

    Journal: Journal of Pain Research

    Article Title: Electroacupuncture Alleviates KOA-Induced Pain and Cartilage Degeneration via NGF/TrkA Pathway

    doi: 10.2147/JPR.S560506

    Figure Lengend Snippet: EA intervention inhibits TrkA expression in CGRP + neurons in DRG of KOA model rats. ( A ) Representative immunofluorescence images of TrkA in DRG from saline group, MIA group, MIA + sham EA group and EA group. Scale bar = 200 µm. ( B ) Quantification of the number of TrkA + cells in DRG across the four groups (per group, n = 3). *p < 0.05; ns: not significant. ( C ) Representative images of double-labelling immunostaining of TrkA + with CGRP + , IB4 + , NF200 + in DRG sections from the saline, MIA, MIA + sham EA, and MIA + EA groups, scale bars = 200 µm. ( D) Pie chart summarizing the proportion of TrkA co-localization in IB4 + , CGRP + , and NF200 + neurons in KOA model rats. Three sections were analyzed per rat, and the results were averaged. ( E ) Quantification of the percentage of CGRP + neurons co-expressing TrkA in the DRG across the four groups (per group, n = 3). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns: ns: not significant. ( F ) Quantification of the percentage of IB4 + neurons co-expressing TrkA in the DRG across the four groups (per group, n = 3). *p < 0.05; ns: not significant. ( G ) Quantification of the percentage of NF200 + neurons co-expressing TrkA in the DRG across the four groups (per group, n = 3).

    Article Snippet: Goat anti-β-NGF antibody (3 μg/mL, R&D Systems, USA), goat anti-TrkA antibody (3 μg/mL, R&D Systems, USA), rabbit anti-PGP9.5 antibody (1:800, Abcam, UK), rabbit anti-TNF-α antibody (1:1000, Abcam, UK), rabbit anti-IL-1β antibody (1:1000, Abcam, UK), rabbit anti-CGRP antibody (1:400, Cell Signaling Technology, USA), mice anti-NF200 antibody (1:200, Cell Signaling Technology, USA), Isolectin B4 (BSI-B4, 1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich, USA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Saline, Immunostaining